<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Ant Best Practices: Prefer a single buildfile</title> <atom:link href="http://www.build-doctor.com/2008/03/19/ant-best-practices-prefer-a-single-buildfile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.build-doctor.com/2008/03/19/ant-best-practices-prefer-a-single-buildfile/</link> <description>Continuous Integration, Delivery and Devops Consulting</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:31:14 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: The Ant Best Practices Series &#8212; The Build Doctor</title><link>http://www.build-doctor.com/2008/03/19/ant-best-practices-prefer-a-single-buildfile/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link> <dc:creator>The Ant Best Practices Series &#8212; The Build Doctor</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 21:48:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://beta.build-doctor.com/?p=27#comment-36</guid> <description>[...] find out. 1 of 15: Adopt consistent style 2 of 15: Put the build file at the root of your project 3 of 15: Prefer a single buildfile 4 of 15: Provide good help 5 of 15: Provide a clean target 6 of 15: Manage dependencies with Ant 7 [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] find out. 1 of 15: Adopt consistent style 2 of 15: Put the build file at the root of your project 3 of 15: Prefer a single buildfile 4 of 15: Provide good help 5 of 15: Provide a clean target 6 of 15: Manage dependencies with Ant 7 [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael Kloss</title><link>http://www.build-doctor.com/2008/03/19/ant-best-practices-prefer-a-single-buildfile/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link> <dc:creator>Michael Kloss</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 10:05:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://beta.build-doctor.com/?p=27#comment-35</guid> <description>I really made the same experience. Having multiple build files a couple of years ago, I now prefer more single build files. But I have noticed that a my preference started by having ant macros in place. So it is very easy to have short and clean single build files and macros doing most of the magic part. Just as you often tried to solve with multiple build files. Ok, macros could be seen also as build file but much more easier to maintain in my opinion because these are more general. My five cents, Michael</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really made the same experience. Having multiple build files a couple of years ago, I now prefer more single build files. But I have noticed that a my preference started by having ant macros in place. So it is very easy to have short and clean single build files and macros doing most of the magic part. Just as you often tried to solve with multiple build files. Ok, macros could be seen also as build file but much more easier to maintain in my opinion because these are more general. My five cents, Michael</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
