<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: A real Build Refactoring, in the wild</title> <atom:link href="http://www.build-doctor.com/2008/05/23/a-real-build-refactoring-in-the-wild/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.build-doctor.com/2008/05/23/a-real-build-refactoring-in-the-wild/</link> <description>Continuous Integration, Delivery and Devops Consulting</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:31:14 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Nat Pryce</title><link>http://www.build-doctor.com/2008/05/23/a-real-build-refactoring-in-the-wild/comment-page-1/#comment-158</link> <dc:creator>Nat Pryce</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 07:15:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://beta.build-doctor.com/?p=48#comment-158</guid> <description>IntelliJ can do some simple refactorings of Ant scripts: extract property, rename target, rename property, etc.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But refactoring of Ant and Nant is very difficult because they have no consistent syntax or semantics.  They are just quick hacks that have grown kludge by kludge into inconsistent pseudo-languages.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IntelliJ can do some simple refactorings of Ant scripts: extract property, rename target, rename property, etc.</p><p>But refactoring of Ant and Nant is very difficult because they have no consistent syntax or semantics.  They are just quick hacks that have grown kludge by kludge into inconsistent pseudo-languages.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
