-
Jeff rules. Automated acceptance dogma will eat your brane. Seen this a lot.
-
Really interesting look at the sysadmin related talks at Agile 2009. I hope I get to go!
-
CITCON guy John is doing some gigs in the UK.
-
If you don't measure it, you can't manage it. Squirrel and co have done exactly the right thing here.
-
Ward interviews Jim about CI.
-
Yes, programming in XML is hard. Still think that some people miss the scope of Ant though. It's not a deployment tool. making it one will hurt.
Blogroll
Popular posts
Useful links
Meta
Categories
- .NET (7)
- Build (51)
- Comics (4)
- Conferences (15)
- Continuous Integration (110)
- Deployment (13)
- DevOps (3)
- eXtreme Feedback Devices (16)
- Java (15)
- Jobs (8)
- News (156)
- links (125)
- Opinion (5)
- Patterns and Practices (23)
- Ruby (7)
- Site Admin (10)
- Systems Administration (11)
- Tools (5)
- Uncategorized (25)
- Version Control Systems (7)
- Video (7)
Job Board Menu
-
Home
Jobs
-
Test Job Post
at Test Job Post
Location: Test, United Kingdom -
Integration/Configuration Engineer
at Eloqua
Location: Vienna "Tyson's Corners", VA -
System Administrator / Devops
at Opera Software
Location: Melbourne, VIC, Australia -
Devops / Sysadmin
at onefinestay
Location: London, United Kingdom -
Devops Engineer / Build
at Gemvara
Location: Boston, MA
-
Test Job Post
at Test Job Post

2 Comments
Julian,
Great point on Ant being a build tool (dependency language based) rather than a deployment tool that requires more general purpose programming features.
This is exactly the point that was made at CITCON Dallas when Martin Fowler preached to the masses about the lameness of Ant and the rise of its replacements. Again, the core complaint was – it’s bad at the scripting needed for deployments and the proper answer is yours: then don’t use it for deployments, use it for builds.
Cheers,
Eric
Eric,
Thanks! I wish people would also get the hang of using Cargo to deploy their apps during builds. All that pain could be averted
J.
Post a Comment