Comments on: Sun enters the Continuous Integration business http://www.build-doctor.com/2009/08/04/sun-continuous-integratio/ Continuous Integration, Delivery and Devops Consulting Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:31:14 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: gorlokhttp://www.build-doctor.com/2009/08/04/sun-continuous-integratio/comment-page-1/#comment-392 gorlok Fri, 07 Aug 2009 04:24:01 +0000 http://www.build-doctor.com/?p=895#comment-392 Last week I had been testing Hudson. And I liked it. It suit very well for our enviroment. Last week I had been testing Hudson. And I liked it. It suit very well for our enviroment.

]]> By: Eduardo Pelegri-Lloparthttp://www.build-doctor.com/2009/08/04/sun-continuous-integratio/comment-page-1/#comment-393 Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart Thu, 06 Aug 2009 04:59:17 +0000 http://www.build-doctor.com/?p=895#comment-393 Hi Julian. A couple of follow-ups on your post. re: "they’ll support a branch of Hudson, and not the open source releases." - We support 1.312 through a series of path releases that only contain the bug fixes. The fixes that go into the patches will be integrated into the main trunk. re: "I think It’ll be a good proposition for Java shops. There’s a huge market for Hudson for other platforms, but I’m not sure that Sun will be chasing it." - Hudson needs a Java container to run but it will support development in many platforms (and languages), and Sun supports that. For practical purposes, if you find a bug on Hudson, we want to be able to reproduce it in our container (GlassFish). If the bug is in, say, JBoss, we don't want to _commit_ to fixing JBoss (or finding a complicated workaround for it); but we will certainly try to address it. Hope this helps, - eduard/o Hi Julian.

A couple of follow-ups on your post.

re: “they’ll support a branch of Hudson, and not the open source releases.” – We support 1.312 through a series of path releases that only contain the bug fixes. The fixes that go into the patches will be integrated into the main trunk.

re: “I think It’ll be a good proposition for Java shops. There’s a huge market for Hudson for other platforms, but I’m not sure that Sun will be chasing it.” – Hudson needs a Java container to run but it will support development in many platforms (and languages), and Sun supports that. For practical purposes, if you find a bug on Hudson, we want to be able to reproduce it in our container (GlassFish). If the bug is in, say, JBoss, we don’t want to _commit_ to fixing JBoss (or finding a complicated workaround for it); but we will certainly try to address it.

Hope this helps,
– eduard/o

]]> By: simpsonjulianhttp://www.build-doctor.com/2009/08/04/sun-continuous-integratio/comment-page-1/#comment-391 simpsonjulian Wed, 05 Aug 2009 22:39:45 +0000 http://www.build-doctor.com/?p=895#comment-391 Yep. And there's more interesting news :) Yep. And there’s more interesting news :)

]]> By: Marco Abishttp://www.build-doctor.com/2009/08/04/sun-continuous-integratio/comment-page-1/#comment-394 Marco Abis Wed, 05 Aug 2009 00:07:52 +0000 http://www.build-doctor.com/?p=895#comment-394 This is really interesting, especially if read remembering the <a href="http://www.build-doctor.com/2009/06/12/continuous-integration-doom-and-gloom" rel="nofollow">"Continuous Integration Doom and Gloom?"</a> post :-) This is really interesting, especially if read remembering the “Continuous Integration Doom and Gloom?” post :-)

]]>