<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deployment is the goal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.build-doctor.com/2009/08/17/deployment-is-the-goal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.build-doctor.com/2009/08/17/deployment-is-the-goal/</link>
	<description>Helping to deliver working software, one continuous integration build at a time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 04:50:11 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: simpsonjulian</title>
		<link>http://www.build-doctor.com/2009/08/17/deployment-is-the-goal/comment-page-1/#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator>simpsonjulian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 22:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.build-doctor.com/2009/08/17/deployment-is-the-goal#comment-401</guid>
		<description>Gary, thanks for the comment.  I wouldn&#039;t shoot you down.  The moment a dev team thinks that testing is someone else&#039;s problem, the rot sets in.  Or the build, for that matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary, thanks for the comment.  I wouldn&#8217;t shoot you down.  The moment a dev team thinks that testing is someone else&#8217;s problem, the rot sets in.  Or the build, for that matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.build-doctor.com/2009/08/17/deployment-is-the-goal/comment-page-1/#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 02:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.build-doctor.com/2009/08/17/deployment-is-the-goal#comment-402</guid>
		<description>Nice piece. There&#039;s a reason why companies, and even volunteer projects, don&#039;t instinctively want to release very frequently: experience teaches us that releases introduce bugs. The key to overcoming this resistance to frequent releases is (IMHO) comprehensive functional and non-functional testing. As all the non-developer types involved with a release gain confidence in the release process as solid, so the frequency of releases can be accelerated.

I&#039;m not a developer, so it&#039;s easy for me to say, but the better the dev team I&#039;ve worked with, generally, the more time spent on testing, and vice versa. Feel free to shoot me down....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice piece. There&#8217;s a reason why companies, and even volunteer projects, don&#8217;t instinctively want to release very frequently: experience teaches us that releases introduce bugs. The key to overcoming this resistance to frequent releases is (IMHO) comprehensive functional and non-functional testing. As all the non-developer types involved with a release gain confidence in the release process as solid, so the frequency of releases can be accelerated.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a developer, so it&#8217;s easy for me to say, but the better the dev team I&#8217;ve worked with, generally, the more time spent on testing, and vice versa. Feel free to shoot me down&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
