<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Build Pattern: Facade</title> <atom:link href="http://www.build-doctor.com/2010/03/02/build-pattern-facade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.build-doctor.com/2010/03/02/build-pattern-facade/</link> <description>Continuous Integration, Delivery and Devops Consulting</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:31:14 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: admin</title><link>http://www.build-doctor.com/2010/03/02/build-pattern-facade/comment-page-1/#comment-992</link> <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:59:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.build-doctor.com/?p=1635#comment-992</guid> <description>@mike - good call on writing your own plugins - I think that&#039;s the way to make simple Ant or Maven tools, with less XML.
@ej - glad you got outta town okay!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mike &#8211; good call on writing your own plugins &#8211; I think that&#8217;s the way to make simple Ant or Maven tools, with less XML.</p><p>@ej &#8211; glad you got outta town okay!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: EJC</title><link>http://www.build-doctor.com/2010/03/02/build-pattern-facade/comment-page-1/#comment-964</link> <dc:creator>EJC</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 22:27:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.build-doctor.com/?p=1635#comment-964</guid> <description>I agree whole heartedly with the maven-calls-ant bit (and vice versa).
We went whole hog and faced pitchforks and torches (I&#039;ll admit to carrying some of them as well).
In hindsight, adopting a smoother transition would have been better.  I look at things like this now with an eye toward evolution, NOT revolution.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree whole heartedly with the maven-calls-ant bit (and vice versa).</p><p>We went whole hog and faced pitchforks and torches (I&#8217;ll admit to carrying some of them as well).</p><p>In hindsight, adopting a smoother transition would have been better.  I look at things like this now with an eye toward evolution, NOT revolution.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: MikeNereson</title><link>http://www.build-doctor.com/2010/03/02/build-pattern-facade/comment-page-1/#comment-962</link> <dc:creator>MikeNereson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 19:19:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.build-doctor.com/?p=1635#comment-962</guid> <description>The first thing that came to mind to me was something that you pointed out -- using the Maven Ant Plugin to call ant tasks from a maven build. Another option for maven users to to write your own plugin to extend build process steps or create new ones.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first thing that came to mind to me was something that you pointed out &#8212; using the Maven Ant Plugin to call ant tasks from a maven build. Another option for maven users to to write your own plugin to extend build process steps or create new ones.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
