<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Build Pattern: Facade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.build-doctor.com/2010/03/02/build-pattern-facade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.build-doctor.com/2010/03/02/build-pattern-facade/</link>
	<description>Continuous Integration to Production</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:17:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.build-doctor.com/2010/03/02/build-pattern-facade/comment-page-1/#comment-992</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.build-doctor.com/?p=1635#comment-992</guid>
		<description>@mike - good call on writing your own plugins - I think that&#039;s the way to make simple Ant or Maven tools, with less XML.

@ej - glad you got outta town okay!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mike &#8211; good call on writing your own plugins &#8211; I think that&#8217;s the way to make simple Ant or Maven tools, with less XML.</p>
<p>@ej &#8211; glad you got outta town okay!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EJC</title>
		<link>http://www.build-doctor.com/2010/03/02/build-pattern-facade/comment-page-1/#comment-964</link>
		<dc:creator>EJC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 22:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.build-doctor.com/?p=1635#comment-964</guid>
		<description>I agree whole heartedly with the maven-calls-ant bit (and vice versa).

We went whole hog and faced pitchforks and torches (I&#039;ll admit to carrying some of them as well).

In hindsight, adopting a smoother transition would have been better.  I look at things like this now with an eye toward evolution, NOT revolution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree whole heartedly with the maven-calls-ant bit (and vice versa).</p>
<p>We went whole hog and faced pitchforks and torches (I&#8217;ll admit to carrying some of them as well).</p>
<p>In hindsight, adopting a smoother transition would have been better.  I look at things like this now with an eye toward evolution, NOT revolution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeNereson</title>
		<link>http://www.build-doctor.com/2010/03/02/build-pattern-facade/comment-page-1/#comment-962</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeNereson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 19:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.build-doctor.com/?p=1635#comment-962</guid>
		<description>The first thing that came to mind to me was something that you pointed out -- using the Maven Ant Plugin to call ant tasks from a maven build. Another option for maven users to to write your own plugin to extend build process steps or create new ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first thing that came to mind to me was something that you pointed out &#8212; using the Maven Ant Plugin to call ant tasks from a maven build. Another option for maven users to to write your own plugin to extend build process steps or create new ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
